In most clubs, academies, and even federations, methodology—that is, how the game model is trained, taught, and transmitted—is the least valued and poorly defined element, when in reality it should be the cornerstone that synchronizes every sports project.
🔹 Common reality:
Immediate results or high-profile signings are prioritized.
The methodology is left to the individual discretion of each coach, regardless of the category or level.
There is no common model that guides work from youth teams to the first team.
🔹 Direct impact:
Inconsistency in training: each coach applies what they want, what they know, or what they think they know.
Loss of identity: The club depends on the current coach.
Waste of talent: Players don’t adapt to the next level because they weren’t trained according to a uniform model.
🔹 Pons Method Proposal:
✅ Make the methodology the central axis of the sports organization.
✅ Design a game model with automated processes (FPM) that all coaches know, apply, and teach from the grassroots to the first team.
✅ Measure progress with biofeedback and data analysis for continuous improvement.
✅ Align recruitment and staffing with coaches and profiles who master or are willing to adopt the established methodology.
🔹 Key Conclusion:
If a club, academy, or federation does not place the methodology at the center, the Sporting Director becomes a “firefighter” rather than an architect. Only by prioritizing the methodology as a common language can synchronization and true continuity be achieved.
